1Automated
Collect agreed records
Read only the system events and documents placed in scope.
BUILT FOR YOU
Compliance evidence collection workflow for Singapore teams
This build-to-order design collects agreed system records, maps them to a control register and prepares a reviewable evidence pack. It is not deployed today and does not certify compliance or replace an accountable reviewer.
Scope this pipelineOne business day reply, Singapore time.
Agent OS from S$2,000 including this pipeline, then S$1,000 for each additional pipeline. Hosted and monitored by us. First 3 months of Agent Care included, then S$150/month. See full pricing
Play here with YouTube's privacy-enhanced player, or watch on YouTube.
How the compliance pipeline moves work safely
Automated stages prepare the work and preserve its context. The visually distinct human gate owns the sensitive decision before anything is released.
- 2Automated
Map to controls
Associate each record with the approved control register and retain provenance.
- 3Automated
Identify gaps
Flag missing, stale or conflicting evidence without declaring the control effective.
- 4Human gate
Review
An accountable person assesses sufficiency and records the conclusion.
- 5Automated
Prepare pack
Assemble reviewed evidence, gaps, owners and timestamps for the agreed audience.
Automated stages prepare the work and its evidence. The human gate controls sensitive decisions and release.
Scope the compliance pipeline
Describe the workflow, review boundary and systems you use. VYR will reply with the fit, scope and constraints—not a guaranteed outcome.
Inputs, decisions, writes and approval
Inputs
Approved controls, in-scope system events, policies, evidence requirements, owners and review cadence.
Agent decisions
Whether a record maps to a control, whether required evidence is missing and which owner should investigate.
Writes
A provenance record, control mapping, gap item, reviewer state and evidence-pack index.
Human approval gate
The control owner, compliance lead or auditor decides sufficiency and meaning. Automation cannot certify itself or the organisation.
Systems this pipeline would touch
- In-scope system logs
- Provide the events explicitly approved for collection.
- Evidence store
- Keeps source, timestamp and provenance together for later inspection.
- Control register
- Defines the requirements and owners used for mapping.
- Review queue
- Holds gaps and proposed mappings for accountable human assessment.
What this pipeline does not do
The boundary is part of the product. These exception paths are intentional, not missing automation.
- It is a build-to-order design, not a deployed assurance or audit product.
- It does not certify compliance, legal conformity or control effectiveness.
- It does not treat the absence of an alert as evidence that a control works.
- It does not collect systems or fields that were not approved for the scope.