Singapore AI Governance Readiness Checklist
Turn Singapore's AI governance guidance into owners, controls, tests, and evidence before an AI system or agent reaches production.
How to use it
Mark an item only when evidence exists
This is a planning checklist, not a compliance score, legal opinion, certification, or substitute for an organisation's accountable review. Each line includes the evidence a review team should be able to inspect. Unchecked items are discussion prompts, not an automatic finding of non-compliance.
Planning progress
0 / 24
24 evidence prompts remaining · 0% marked
24 evidence prompts
Review the four agentic AI governance dimensions
The four dimensions follow IMDA's 2026 Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI. The individual checks and evidence examples are VYR's practical interpretation, not official IMDA wording.
Dimension 1 · Assess and bound risks up front
Bound risk and autonomy
Define the objective, impact, data, tools, prohibited behaviour, and release boundary before an agent receives production access.
Dimension 2 · Make humans meaningfully accountable
Meaningful human accountability
Name the people who may approve, change, monitor, investigate, accept risk, and stop the system. A generic human-in-the-loop claim is not enough.
Dimension 3 · Implement technical controls and lifecycle processes
Lifecycle technical controls
Treat governance as an operating system of permissions, tests, event records, monitoring, change control, incident response, and retirement—not a launch document.
Dimension 4 · Enable end-user responsibility through transparency and training
End-user responsibility
Give operators and affected users enough information, control, and support to use the system appropriately and challenge an outcome when needed.
Primary sources
Validate the plan against current official guidance
Guidance and platform capabilities change. Record the source version and review date used by the project. Legal, regulatory, sector, employment, consumer, intellectual-property, and contractual questions should be reviewed by the appropriate accountable specialists for the actual deployment.
Turn the checklist into an evidence-backed release plan
Use the checklist with VYR's Singapore AI governance framework guide, then assign each missing artefact to an owner and a release gate. A VYR scoping conversation can help translate the workflow into technical requirements, but accountability and formal approval remain with the deploying organisation.
Optional next step
Want a second pair of eyes on the gaps?
Tell us which dimension you scored worst on. We will tell you which gaps typically matter for a Singapore deployment and which are safe to defer - or that your setup already looks sound and you do not need us.